Deputy vs Tanda for Australian Shift Businesses in 2026: Which Rostering Tool Wins?
Our pick: Deputy. The verdict below says who should buy the other.
Winner: Deputy for the typical hospitality or retail operator. It matches Tanda on award compliance and pulls ahead on AI, mobile, and integrations. Pick Tanda if wage-compliance accuracy is your single highest-stakes problem.
Last reviewed: 30 June 2026 by Adam.
This is the closest head-to-head we have run in the Workforce and Rostering category. Both tools were built in Australia. Both bill in AUD. Both interpret Modern Awards out of the box. One point separates them in our scoring — Deputy on 21/25, Tanda on 20/25.
So the honest answer is not "one is good, one is bad." It is: they solve slightly different problems for the same buyer. Deputy is the polished, widely integrated option with the bigger ecosystem and a genuine AI agent. Tanda leans harder into award compliance and payroll accuracy for wage-heavy workplaces. A café owner in Fitzroy and a pharmacy group in Parramatta might rationally choose differently. Here is how to tell which one is you.
Quick comparison
| Deputy | Tanda | |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price (AUD, excl. GST) | $6.75/user/mo (Lite) | $12.80/user/mo (all-in-one) |
| Typical config (AUD, excl. GST) | ~$13.75/user/mo (Core + Payroll) | $12.80/user/mo (WFM + Payroll + HR) |
| Minimum monthly spend | A$30 per invoice | Not publicly stated |
| Conversational AI agent | ✅ Yes | ❌ No |
| Modern Award interpretation | ✅ Yes | ✅ Yes (deeper on complex awards) |
| STP Phase 2 payroll | ✅ Add-on | ✅ Native |
| Founded / HQ | 2008, Sydney | 2012, Brisbane |
| AU data residency (pinned publicly) | Not published | Not published |
| Score (out of 25) | 21/25 ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ | 20/25 ⭐⭐⭐⭐ |
Scores are drawn from our full Deputy review and Tanda review. We are not re-scoring here.
What both tools actually do
Both platforms manage the full shift-work loop: build a roster, have staff clock in, turn those clock-ins into timesheets, apply the correct award rates, and run payroll. For a hospitality or retail operator, that loop is the daily grind. Getting it wrong means underpaid staff, Fair Work exposure, or blown labour budgets.
Both use demand-driven rostering. They pull historical sales data from your POS to suggest how many people you need per time slot. Both show a projected labour cost as you build the roster, so you can weigh a penalty-rate shift against calling in casual cover before you commit.
The core difference is what sits on top. Deputy has built a conversational AI agent that takes natural-language instructions. Tanda's intelligence is smart automation — data-informed suggestions and auto-approval logic — rather than a chat agent. That gap defines most of what follows.
Pricing in Australia
Both vendors price in AUD and quote excluding GST, which is correct for business tools. Invoices add GST for Australian accounts. This is a clean comparison with no currency conversion needed — a rarity in this directory.
Deputy is modular. Lite is $6.75, Core is $8.75, and Pro is $13 per user per month, all AUD excluding GST. Payroll is a $5 add-on and HR is $3.50. The headline looks cheap, but the realistic hospitality configuration is Core plus Payroll, which lands around $13.75 per user before GST. A minimum spend of A$30 per invoice applies, effective September 2025, so very small teams pay more per head than the sticker suggests.
Tanda bundles. The all-in-one configuration — Workforce Management, Payroll, and HR — is $12.80 + GST per user per month. That is one number, one invoice, three modules. Tanda does not publish per-module pricing; individual modules are sales-led and quoted on request.
The practical read: at a full three-module configuration, Tanda's $12.80 undercuts Deputy's equivalent (Core + Payroll + HR is roughly $17.25 before GST). But most operators do not need Deputy's HR module, and Deputy's Core + Payroll at ~$13.75 sits within a dollar of Tanda's bundle. Price alone will not decide this.
Where Deputy wins
- The AI agent is real. Type "Caesar's sick tomorrow, find a replacement" and Deputy surfaces eligible staff, prepares the change, and waits for your confirmation. Tanda has no equivalent conversational capability. For a manager who lives on their phone, this is the single biggest daily difference.
- Mobile experience. Deputy's iOS and Android apps rate 4.8/5 on the App Store across 3,600-plus reviews as of mid-2026. That rating matters because shift workers are the daily users of the clock-in function.
- Ecosystem and integrations. Deputy connects natively to MYOB, Xero, QuickBooks, KeyPay, and a wide range of POS systems. Most Australian businesses will not need a middleware layer.
- Scale and maturity. Deputy reports use across more than 390,000 workplaces globally and reached unicorn status in 2024. The bigger install base means more third-party integrations and a deeper support bench.
- Feature depth. We scored Deputy 5/5 on Feature Depth against Tanda's 4/5. The AI agent, demand forecasting, and award engine together are genuinely deep, not a marketing badge.
Where Tanda wins
- Award interpretation on the hard cases. Both handle standard penalty rates. Tanda goes further on the genuinely complex ones — childcare ratio rules, pharmacy penalty rates, and club industry allowances. For a business living under a thorny award, this is the whole game.
- Native STP payroll. Tanda Payroll files STP Phase 2 directly from approved timesheets, no export to a separate system. Deputy keeps payroll as a modular add-on. Tanda's is more integrated end to end.
- Australian Fit. Tanda scored a perfect 5/5 on Australian Fit against Deputy's 4/5. Brisbane-founded, AUD-native, dedicated Australian compliance team, superannuation built into payroll. It is about as Australian as this category gets.
- All-in-one simplicity. One bundle, one invoice, one support team. For an operator who wants a single number rather than a configuration exercise, Tanda is cleaner.
- Timesheet auto-approval. Tanda auto-approves timesheets that match the roster within tolerance, flagging only exceptions. Champions IGA's payroll manager reported cutting payroll processing time by nearly half. For weekly pay runs across dozens of staff, that is real admin saved.
Which to pick — decision framework
- If you want AI to handle shift changes in plain language, pick Deputy. No contest. Tanda has no conversational agent.
- If your award is genuinely complex — childcare, pharmacy, clubs, healthcare ratios — lean Tanda. Its compliance depth is the market leader on hard cases.
- If you run a standard café, restaurant, or retail shop, pick Deputy. Its award engine handles the hospitality and retail awards comfortably, and you get the better mobile app and AI on top.
- If you want the whole stack — rostering, payroll, HR — in one invoice, Tanda's $12.80 bundle is the cleaner buy.
- If you might expand overseas, pick Deputy. Tanda is laser-focused on Australia and New Zealand. Deputy operates globally.
The verdict
For the typical Australian hospitality or retail operator, Deputy is the pick. It matches Tanda where it counts — real Modern Award interpretation, AUD-native billing, an Australian compliance team — and then adds a working AI agent, a best-in-class mobile app, and a broader integration ecosystem. That is why it carries our category Top Pick and a 21/25, one point clear of Tanda's 20/25.
But this is not a knockout. Tanda earns its four stars and deserves a serious look from any wage-heavy business where payroll accuracy is the highest-stakes risk. If you run a pharmacy group, a childcare network, or a franchise navigating complex penalty structures, Tanda's compliance engine and native STP payroll may matter more than Deputy's AI polish. Its perfect Australian Fit score is no accident.
Both companies are Australian. Both bill honestly in AUD. Neither publishes a specific Australian data-residency commitment — if data sovereignty is a hard requirement, request a Data Processing Agreement from either vendor before signing. Workforce software touches wages, super, and Fair Work obligations, so neither tool replaces qualified professional payroll or employment advice. Choose on the problem you most need solved: AI-assisted daily operations point to Deputy; airtight complex-award payroll points to Tanda.
Frequently asked questions
Deputy or Tanda — which is better for an Australian hospitality business?
For a typical hospitality or retail operator, Deputy is our pick. It matches Tanda on Modern Award interpretation and AUD-native billing, then adds a genuine conversational AI agent, a 4.8-star mobile app, and a broader integration ecosystem. Deputy scores 21/25 to Tanda's 20/25. Choose Tanda if your business runs under a complex award — pharmacy, childcare, clubs — where payroll compliance accuracy is the highest-stakes risk.
How do Deputy and Tanda compare on price in Australia?
Deputy is modular: Lite $6.75, Core $8.75, and Pro $13 per user per month (AUD, excl. GST), with Payroll a $5 add-on and HR $3.50. A minimum spend of A$30 per invoice applies. Tanda bundles Workforce Management, Payroll, and HR into one all-in-one plan at $12.80 + GST per user per month. A typical Deputy Core-plus-Payroll setup lands around $13.75 before GST, within a dollar of Tanda's bundle.
Do Deputy and Tanda both handle Australian Modern Award compliance?
Yes. Both interpret Modern Awards out of the box, covering penalty rates, overtime, allowances, and breaks. Tanda goes deeper on the most complex awards — childcare ratios, pharmacy penalty rates, and club industry allowances — and files STP Phase 2 payroll natively. Deputy's award engine handles standard hospitality and retail awards well and pairs it with a conversational AI scheduling agent that Tanda does not offer.
Sources
- Deputy AU pricing page: https://www.deputy.com/au/pricing (accessed 30 June 2026) — Wayback 19 April 2026
- Tanda pricing page: https://www.tanda.com.au/pricing (accessed 30 June 2026) — Wayback: not yet captured (snapshot pending)
- Deputy AI feature page: https://www.deputy.com/au/ai (accessed 30 June 2026) — Wayback 13 May 2026
- Tanda Award Interpretation: https://www.tanda.com.au/features/industry-award-interpretation (accessed 30 June 2026) — Wayback 13 June 2026
- Scores and verdicts drawn from The AI Directory's full Deputy review (21/25) and Tanda review (20/25), both last reviewed 26 June 2026.
The AI Directory Australia is an independent editorial publication. We don't accept payment for positive reviews. Read our Methodology and Affiliate Disclosure.
Price Watch · Free
Know before your AI bill changes
A short email when AI tools change what they charge Australians: the new price in AUD, what it means for you, and whether to switch. No hype, no spam, unsubscribe any time.